I know a good number of Christians and Catholics who believe you'll go to hell if you don't believe in God. This belief varies to a pretty good range; some believe you have to subscribe to their particular belief system, and some believe that salvation is sufficient if you just believe in a monotheistic God at all.
If a person
really believes people will go to hell for not believing in God, I can also understand why they would try so hard to convert people, even to the point of threatening them (though these are pretty extreme cases). It makes sense. You don't want the people you love to burn in hell, right?
So what about the people who believe you'll go to hell but don't try to convert you to their side? Oh, I know most of them are probably just trying to be respectful about other people's religions (or lack thereof), but how much respect are they really giving you if they're going to let you burn in hell after you die?
Or are we all really "agreeing to respectfully disagree?" Maybe it's sort of like, "Oh, I don't really like the fact that you're Republican, but I can respect you overall because you're A, B, and C?" But how is that really comparable? This is HELL we're talking about, folks. It does
not sit well with me to have someone say, "Well, you're going to hell after you die, but I think it's great that you donate to charities and adopt children with special needs."
"So what happens to people who don't know about God?" I asked Marc last week.
"They don't go to Hell."
"So why preach to people about God and risk getting them into Hell in the first place?"
"The Bible also says we're to spread the Word of God everywhere."
Now if we accept the premise that the Holy Bible is infallible and good, then this logic is fine. To claim Catholicism is to accept the logic of their structure.
Sigh. I'm tempted, but I'm not going into a critique of the validity of the Bible and how to interpret it. I'm already deviating from the main point of this entry, which is really: if you believe I'm going to Hell for being agnostic, yet you actually
like me, why aren't you trying to save me? :P
Wait a sec. Let's say a person thinks it's sufficient enough to believe in a monotheistic God to attain salvation. Now how close would an agnostic be to salvation? They're only admitting that they don't know if there IS a God, so they're not quite
rejecting God.
Edit @ 12:43pm, More on the VaticanAccording to
this article by Yahoo! News, the Vatican says modern feminism is "dangerous for family." But a lot of the main points in the article doesn't seem to contradict feminist tenets at all:
"The document called for greater recognition of a woman's role as a mother and urged society to value it as real work.
"But it also said women's access to the workplace and to positions of authority should not be limited.
"'Although motherhood is a key element of women's identity, this does not mean that women should be considered from the sole perspective of physical procreation,' it said.
"The Vatican said women who choose to be full-time mothers should not be stigmatized, but at the same time, it appealed to governments to make it easier for mothers to hold outside jobs without 'relinquishing their family life.'"
As an added note, feminism could be considered its own modern religion. It's even got denominations of feminists! :)